Does violence in movies and TV contribute to real violence in society? What are the findings around the world, beyond American society?

This is a ChatGPT answer. For my introduction, see Earthpages Highlights.

Scene from Deadpool and Wolverine

The question of whether violence in movies and TV contributes to real violence in society is complex, and research across different cultures and countries provides nuanced insights. While the evidence regarding a direct causal link between media violence and real-world violence remains mixed, several findings shed light on global patterns and contextual factors that influence this relationship.

1. Global Findings on Media Violence and Aggression

The effects of media violence on aggression or violence in society are often studied in both individual and societal contexts. While some studies support a correlation between violent media and aggression, others emphasize that it is only one factor among many that contribute to societal violence.

Cross-Cultural Studies:

• Increased Media Violence and Increased Aggression (Some Evidence): Studies conducted in countries like Japan, Germany, and the UK show that there is a mild correlation between media violence exposure and increased aggressive behavior in individuals, particularly among younger viewers. Research has found that children and adolescents who consume violent media may exhibit more aggressive behavior, both verbally and physically. This trend is often seen across Western and non-Western cultures.

• North America & Western Europe: Countries with high levels of media consumption, like the United States, Canada, and much of Western Europe, also see a strong relationship between violent media consumption and aggressive behavior. However, there is a caveat: these correlations do not imply direct causality, and other cultural factors—such as economic inequality, social norms, and education systems—play a significant role in mediating this relationship.

Low vs. High Violence Societies:

• Lower-Violence Countries: Some countries, such as Scandinavia (e.g., Norway, Sweden), have relatively high media violence consumption but lower real-world violence rates. In these cases, strong social safety nets, education, and progressive cultural attitudes likely mitigate the effects of media violence. Research suggests that these countries have a well-established focus on mental health and community well-being, which may reduce the potential for media violence to manifest as actual violence.

• Higher-Violence Countries: Countries with high rates of social instability, like Brazil, Mexico, or some parts of Eastern Europe, where poverty, inequality, and social unrest are more prevalent, may exhibit a stronger connection between media violence and aggressive behavior. In these regions, violent media might serve as one contributing factor to real-world violence, but the underlying social conditions (e.g., lack of economic opportunity, access to education, or mental health services) are significant drivers.

2. Longitudinal Studies and Societal Violence

Longitudinal studies that follow individuals or groups over time can shed light on whether exposure to violent media correlates with long-term violent behaviors in real life.

• Increased Media Violence in the 20th Century: In countries with significant exposure to violent media, such as the U.S., UK, and Australia, some research has shown that increased media violence over the last few decades coincides with rising concerns about youth aggression. However, this connection does not prove causality. It's more likely that it’s one factor among many influencing societal violence rates. Many researchers argue that other variables, such as increasing urbanization, social inequality, and access to firearms, are more significant contributors to real-world violence.

• Comparing Countries with Different Media Regulations: Countries with strict regulations on violent media content (e.g., South Korea, Singapore, and some European countries) tend to have lower rates of violent crime compared to countries with more permissive media policies (e.g., United States, Brazil). However, this is a correlation, not evidence of causality, and these countries also differ significantly in factors like education systems, law enforcement, and public health approaches.

3. Other Global Considerations Beyond Media Violence

The impact of media violence on real-world violence varies widely depending on broader societal and cultural factors:

Cultural Norms and Values:

• In countries where violence is normalized or culturally ingrained (e.g., in some regions with ongoing conflicts or political instability), the effects of violent media might be more pronounced. In such environments, media violence may reflect and reinforce pre-existing cultural norms about aggression, making its influence on real-world violence stronger.

Social and Economic Factors:

• Social Inequality and Poverty: Countries with higher rates of violence often have high levels of poverty, social inequality, and marginalization, which contribute far more significantly to real-world violence than media violence. In these environments, media violence might be just one of many stressors contributing to violence, rather than a primary cause.

• Mental Health: Access to mental health services plays a major role in mitigating the effects of violent media. Countries with well-established mental health systems (e.g., Scandinavian countries) are less likely to see a strong connection between violent media and aggression because individuals who are vulnerable to violent behavior have more support and coping mechanisms.

Media Regulation:

Countries with stronger media regulations (such as Germany or South Korea) often report lower levels of violent behavior associated with media exposure, although this is influenced by many factors, including how media is consumed and the types of violence depicted. These countries have systems that limit violent content for younger audiences, but this doesn't necessarily translate into lower levels of real-world violence.

4. Conclusion: Global Perspective

While media violence may contribute to aggressive behaviors in individuals in a variety of countries, it is not the sole factor behind real-world violence. The relationship between violent media and violence in society is influenced by a complex interplay of social, cultural, economic, and individual factors.

• Some evidence supports the idea that media violence can contribute to aggression, but it is typically more about increased aggression rather than outright violence.
• Socioeconomic factors such as poverty, inequality, and lack of mental health care are more significant drivers of violence in societies.
• Cultural differences play a huge role in how violent media is consumed and how it might affect different populations.

Therefore, while violence in media can influence behavior, it is a part of a much larger and more complex picture, and global research underscores the importance of considering the broader societal context in understanding the impact of media violence.