The Cosmic Body: Varna, Jāti, and the Making of Caste

In ancient India, human hierarchy was not first imagined as a social injustice or political tool, but as a divinely ordained order woven into the structure of creation itself. The system of differentiation—expressed through the twin concepts of varna (“color” or class) and jāti (birth group or sub-caste)—was seen as mirroring the cosmos, emerging from the primordial sacrifice of the Divine Being, the Puruṣa.

Netchev, S. (2024, September 10). World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://www.worldhistory.org/image/19424/the-four-castes-of-ancient-india---the-varna-syste/

The Primal Sacrifice: The Vision of the Puruṣa Sūkta

The idea finds its most vivid expression in the Puruṣa Sūkta (Hymn 90 of the Ṛgveda), a text that describes a cosmic act of self-offering. The Puruṣa, or Cosmic Man, is ritually dismembered in a yajña (sacrifice), and from this act the universe itself arises—the sun, moon, atmosphere, and the sacred rhythms of ritual and time.

From this divine body also emerge the four varna, each linked to a part of the Puruṣa:

  • Brahman (Priests, Thinkers): From the head/mouth, representing speech, knowledge, and spiritual purity.

  • Kṣatriya (Rulers, Warriors): From the arms, symbolizing strength, protection, and governance.

  • Vaiśya (Producers, Traders): From the thighs, standing for sustenance, economy, and exchange.

  • Śūdra (Servants, Laborers): From the feet, grounding society through service and stability.

This imagery presents society as a living organism, where harmony depends not on sameness but on the proper functioning of each part within the whole.

That said, many historians point out that the Puruṣa Sūkta is probably a later addition to the Ṛgveda, reflecting an emerging social hierarchy rather than an original Vedic truth. The rigid, birth-based caste system we know today evolved much later, as these spiritual metaphors hardened into social law.

Dharma, Exclusion, and the Human Dilemma

In theory, dharma—one’s moral and social duty—binds all beings into a meaningful whole, a concept not unlike St. Paul’s image of the Church as a single body with many members. In practice, however, the Vedic and later Brahmanical systems restricted spiritual knowledge to the upper castes. The Śūdras were forbidden to study the Veda or perform high rituals, and over time, an even more marginalized group appeared: the Aśpṛśya, or “untouchables.”

These groups performed work considered ritually polluting—leatherwork, cremation, cleaning—and were placed entirely outside the fourfold system (Cāturvarṇya). Some early thinkers proposed that the Śūdra and later Dalit groups absorbed pre-Vedic or indigenous populations such as the Dravidians, though that idea remains debated.

Mahatma Gandhi called the oppressed classes Harijans, “Children of God,” while modern activists prefer Dalit, meaning “broken” or “oppressed,” a term that carries both pain and pride. The Indian government officially recognizes these communities as Scheduled Castes, granting legal protections and affirmative action—but the stigma, in many areas, remains deeply ingrained.

The Twice-Born and the Question of Privilege

The upper three varna—Brahman, Kṣatriya, and Vaiśya—are called the dvija, or “twice-born.” Around age twelve, a boy of these castes traditionally undergoes upanayana, the sacred-thread initiation (yajnopavīta) that marks spiritual rebirth and entry into Vedic study. The ritual symbolizes access to higher knowledge and social prestige—a door historically closed to others.

Buddhism, emerging around the 5th century BCE, directly challenged this system, offering a path of enlightenment open to all, regardless of birth. Yet, even in Buddhist societies, caste-like distinctions eventually crept back in—proof that the human urge to rank and exclude runs deeper than doctrine.

In the West, “class” systems evolved from different roots—economic, educational, or political—but they serve similar functions: organizing people into hierarchies of worth and opportunity.

Reform, Continuity, and the Global Present

The 20th century saw powerful attempts to break this ancient order. B. R. Ambedkar, himself a Dalit and architect of India’s Constitution, fought to outlaw untouchability and enshrine equality before the law. The 1950 Constitution legally abolished caste discrimination, but laws cannot easily erase the habits of centuries.

Caste identities still shape marriage, politics, and everyday life—not only in India but across the global Indian diaspora. What began as a sacred vision of cosmic order has become a social DNA, inherited through family, reinforced by community, and reinterpreted in new contexts.

At the same time, the medieval bhakti (devotional) movements—saints like Kabir, Tukaram, and Mirabai—rose in open defiance of caste pride. Their poetry proclaimed that divine grace flows to all who love God, not just to those of high birth. That vision remains the spiritual countercurrent to hierarchy, still alive in temples, songs, and hearts today.

A Continuing Conversation

The conversation around varna and jāti is far from over. Some still see divine order in differentiation; others see injustice masquerading as sacred law. Both perspectives confront the same enduring question:
How do we honor spiritual unity while acknowledging human diversity?
 

Comments